This High Court disposed of a civil application, holding it misconceived because the applicant was neither a party to the underlying appeal nor to the suit, and thus could not complain about an interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.343 OF 2006
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.159 OF 1999
M/s R.N.A. Builders ..... Petitioners.
V/s
Mrs. Asgari wd/o. Kutubuddin Basiruddin & Ors. ..... Respondents.
And
M/s. New Bharat Forging and Engineering Company & Ors. .... Applicants.
Mr. Rajesh Patil i/b Mr. Y.M. Chaudhary for applicants.
Mr. R. N. Shetty for Respondent No.1. ----
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & V.M. KANADE, JJ.
DATE : 19th November, 2007.
P.C.:
Heard learned Counsel for the applicant. Perused the
order dated 3rd March, 2000 as also order dated 9th March, 1999. Applicant is not a party to the appeal. He was also
2
not a party to the suit and, therefore, he cannot make any grievance against the interim order which is granted by this Court. Civil Application is misconceived and, therefore disposed of.
(D.K. DESHMUKH, J.)
(V.M. KANADE, J.)
M/s R.N.A. Builders
Mrs. Asgari wd/o. Kutubuddin Basiruddin
M/s. New Bharat Forging and Engineering Company
D.K. DESHMUKH
V.M. KANADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
