Dismissed

Suresh Dattaram Bagul v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC8 Aug 2007WP/4319/2006

Case brief

from the order text

THE THE THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…

AI extract

Suresh Dattaram Bagul Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors. — Bombay HC (2007) — LawSathi Research

	IN	THE HIGH APP	COURT OF JU ELLATE	DICATUR	E AT B	OMBAY SIDE
		WRIT PET	ITION NO.	4319	OF	2006
SURSH D	ATTAR VS	AM BAGUL .	...	P	ETITIONER.
THE STA	TE OF	MAHARASHTRA	...		RESPONDENT.
NONE		FOR	THE		PETIT	IONER.
MR.		V.A.GANGAL	FOR	RESPON	DENT	NO.2.
M/S.	J.NAIR	& A	SSOCIATES FO	R RE	SPONDENT	;NO.3.
MR.	NARG	OLKAR AGP	FOR THE	RES	PONDENT	NO.1.
		CORAM	..... : J.N.Patel	and	A.A.Sayed,	JJ.
		DATE	:	August	8,	2007.
P.C.			.....
1.		None	for	the	p	etitioner.
2.	We	were infor	med that the	Advo	cate for	the
Petitioner		comes from	Nasik. We	do not	find	that
this	can	be a reason	to condone	his abs	ence. As	the
Petition		remains to	be prosecuted	for	non ap	pearance
of	the	Petitioner or	his advocate.	We	are i	nformed
that	afte	r filing	of the reply,	the	Petitioner	has

not taken any interest in prosecuting the petition,

which is pending since the year 2006.

of prosecution.

[J.N.Patel, J.]