Disposed

Madhavi Mahesh Ambre and Othrs v. the New India Assurance Co.

Bombay HC8 Aug 2007CAF/3856/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court, in three companion orders passed on August 8, 2007, disposed of miscellaneous civil applications filed under the same appeal number. One order permitted withdrawal of deposited amounts, another condoned delay and admitted the appeal, and a third declared an application infructuous as compensation was already deposited.

What did the court decide?

One order permitted withdrawal of deposits; another admitted the appeal and condoned delay; a third declared an application infructuous.

Madhavi Mahesh Ambre and Othrs Vs the New India Assurance Co. — Bombay HC (2007) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

IN THE	HIGH	COURT	OF JUDIC	ATURE	AT BO	MBAY
	APP	ELLATE				SIDE
CIVIL	APPLI	CATION	NO.	3856	OF	2007
		IN
FIRST	APPEAL	(ST)	NO.	17228	OF	2006
MADHAVI	MAH	ESH	AM	BRE		AND
ORS.			...	APP	LICANTS
VS.
THE NEW		INDIA	A	SSURANC	E	CO.
AND ANR.			...	RES	PONDENTS.
MS. AARTI	BARVE	FOR	APPELLANT	IN	FA.ST.NO.1	7228/06
AND FOR APPLICANTS 4611/07 AND FOR RESPO	IN C.A.NO NDENTS IN	. 4610/07 C.A. NO.	& C.A.NO. 3856/07.
MR. R.R.SALVI	FOR	THE	APPLICANTS	IN	C.A.	NO.
3856/07, FOR RESPONDE	NTS IN F.A	. ST.NO.	1728/06,
C.A.NO.4610/07 & 4611/07	.

¶3

CORAM : J.N.Patel and A.A.Sayed, JJ.

¶4

DATE : August 8, 2007.

¶5

P.C.

¶6

¶7

Heard. 1. By this application, the claimant- seeks permission to withdraw the amount deposited in pursuance of the Order dated 6th February, 2006 passed in MAC Petition No. 32 of 2000. Permitted to withdraw. 2. We are permitting the appellant to withdraw the amount in terms of the Order of disbursement, passed by the Tribunal while disposing of the claim Petition by its order, dated 6th February, 2006. 3. Application stands disposed of accordingly. .....

¶8

[J.N.PATEL, J.] [A.A.SAYED, J.]

¶9

¶10

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶11

APPELLATE SIDE

¶12

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4610 OF 2007

¶13

¶14

FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 17228 OF 2006

¶15

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. ... VS.

¶16

APPLICANTS.

¶17

MADHAVI MAHESH AMBRE AND ORS. ... RESPONDENTS.

¶18

MS. AARTI BARVE FOR APPELLANT IN FA.ST.NO.17228/06

¶19

AND FOR APPLICANTS IN C.A.NO. 4610/07 & C.A.NO.

¶20

4611/07 AND FOR RESPONDENTS IN C.A. NO.3856/07.

¶21

MR. R.R.SALVI FOR THE APPLICANTS IN C.A. NO.

¶22

3856/07, FOR RESPONDENTS IN F.A. ST.NO. 1728/06, C.A.NO.4610/07 & 4611/07.

¶23

CORAM : J.N.Patel and A.A.Sayed, JJ. DATE : August 8, 2007.

¶24

P.C.

¶25

¶26

Heard.

¶27

For the reasons stated in the application,

¶28

the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

¶29

Office to register the appeal.

¶30

By consent, the appeal is taken up for

admission.

[J.N.PATEL, J.]

[A.A.SAYED, J.]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶36

APPELLATE SIDE

¶37

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4611 OF 2007

¶38

¶39

FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 17228 OF 2006

¶40

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. ... VS.

¶41

APPLICANTS.

¶42

MADHAVI MAHESH AMBRE AND ORS. ... RESPONDENTS.

¶43

MS. AARTI BARVE FOR APPELLANT IN FA.ST.NO.17228/06

¶44

AND FOR APPLICANTS IN C.A.NO. 4610/07 & C.A.NO. 4611/07 AND FOR RESPONDENTS IN C.A. NO.3856/07.

¶45

MR. R.R.SALVI FOR THE APPLICANTS IN C.A. NO.

¶46

3856/07, FOR RESPONDENTS IN F.A. ST.NO. 1728/06, C.A.NO.4610/07 & 4611/07.

¶47

CORAM : J.N.Patel and A.A.Sayed, JJ. DATE : August 8, 2007.

¶48

P.C.

¶49

¶50

Heard.

¶51

In view of the fact that the appellant has
already deposited the amount of compensation as per
the Award of the Tribunal and this Court has
permitted the respondent-claimant to withdraw the

¶52

same, the application, therefore, does not survive

¶53

and stands disposed of as infructuous.

¶54

[J.N.Patel, J.]

¶55

¶56

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶57

APPELLATE SIDE

¶58

FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 17228 OF 2006

¶59

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. ...

¶60

APPELLANTS.

¶61

VS. MADHAVI MAHESH AMBRE AND ORS. ... RESPONDENTS. MS. AARTI BARVE FOR APPELLANT IN FA.ST.NO.17228/06 AND FOR APPLICANTS IN C.A.NO. 4610/07 & C.A.NO. 4611/07 AND FOR RESPONDENTS IN C.A. NO.3856/07. MR. R.R.SALVI FOR THE APPLICANTS IN C.A. NO. 3856/07, FOR RESPONDENTS IN F.A. ST.NO. 1728/06, C.A.NO.4610/07 & 4611/07.

¶62

CORAM : J.N.Patel and A.A.Sayed, JJ.

¶63

DATE : August 8, 2007. ..... P.C. 1. Heard. 2. Admit. .....

¶64

[J.N.Patel, J.]

¶65

[A.A.Sayed, J.]

Madhavi Mahesh Ambre and Othrs v. the New India Assurance Co.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhavi Mahesh Ambre and Othrs v. the New India Assurance Co.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Imperial Irrigation and Biotech Private Ltd. Vs Maharashtra State Farming Corporation Ltd.

Annappa Kashinath Ligade Vs Additional Commissioner Pune Div.

Nandkumar Dnyandeo Patange and Ors. Vs Hindustan Petroleum Co.K.I.Ltd. and Anr.

Deepak Revachand Talreja Vs the State of Maharashtra

M/S. Priyanka Enterprises Vs the State of Maharashtra

Suresh Dattaram Bagul Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.