Annappa Kashinath Ligade v. Additional Commissioner Pune Div.
Bombay HCCAL/105/2004
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
1
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶3
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶4
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 105 OF 2004
¶5
IN
¶6
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL ST. NO. 6062 OF 2004
¶7
IN
¶8
WRIT PETITION NO. 1151 OF 2003
¶9
Annappa Kashinath Ligade. .. Applicant.
vs.
¶10
Additional Commissioner,
Pune Division & Ors. .. Respondents.
¶11
Dr. V.K. Choudhari for Applicant.
Mr. N.R. Patil for R. No. 3.
¶12
Mr. S.G. Deshmukh for R. No. 4.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Annappa Kashinath Ligade
- respondent
Additional Commissioner, Pune Division & Ors.
Coram
AI extract
J.N. Patel
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court