This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITIN NO.4166 OF 2005
Dagadu M. Mulani .
since deceased through his legal .
heir D.D. Mulani & Ors. ....Petitioners
V/s.
Mahadeo Jatti Guru Vitthal .
Jatti Gosavi & Ors. ....Respondents
Mr.P.B. Shah for the Petitioner.
Mr.Uday Warunjikar with Mr.B. Deshmukh for Respondent
No.1. .
Mr.V.S. Gokhale, AGP for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.
DATED : 19TH JANUARY, 2007.
P.C.:
1.The Petition is disposed of in terms of the
consent terms signed by the parties and their
advocates, tendered in Court, taken on record and
marked "X" for identification. It is stated that
Petitioner No.4 has expired. Mr.Warunjukar, the
learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent
No.1, states that the heir of Petitioner No.4 one
Ramdas Baban Jadhav is present in Court and has signed
the consent terms. He is identified by the advocate
on record of Respondent No.1 and not by the advocate
for the Petitioners. This order will not affect the
rights of any other persons who may be found to be the
heirs of Petitioner No.4. Petitioner Nos.1 to 3 and
Respondent No.1 are present in Court.
Dagadu M. Mulani
D.D. Mulani
Mahadeo Jatti
Guru Vitthal Jatti Gosavi
S.J. VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court