Petitioner's criminal writ petition was allowed to be withdrawn after the Respondents agreed to file a charge sheet within five months. The court disposed of the matter as withdrawn without expressing an opinion on issues raised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.398 OF 2007
M/s.Kulja Industries Limited : Petitioner
versus
CBI, ACB, Mumbai & ors. : Respondents.
Mr.H.Ponda with Mr.V.N.Shingarpure for the
Petitioner.
Mr.R.F.Lambe for Respondent No.1.
Mr.N.C.Patel for Respondent No.3.
Mrs.A.S.Pai, APP, for the State.
CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 04, 2007.
P.C.
1. Learned advocate appearing for Respondent
No.1 states that in the process of finalisation
of investigation, a charge sheet will be filed
within five months from today. We accept the
2
said statement. In pursuance of acceptance of
the said statement, learned counsel appearing for
the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the
petition. Petition is, accordingly, allowed to
be withdrawn. We make it clear that We have not
expressed any opinion on any issue raised in the
matter. Petition is disposed off as withdrawn.
[R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
M/s.Kulja Industries Limited
CBI
ACB, Mumbai
R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court