Nirav Harshadrai Shah v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner allowed to withdraw the petition. Disposed of as such.
What did the court decide?
Petition allowed to be withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-(1)-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1342 OF 2007
Nirav Harshadrai Shah. ..Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent.
Mr.Sanjay Bhatia, Adv. for the Petitioner.
Mrs.A.S.Pai, APP, for the State.
CORAM : R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 03, 2007.
P.C.:-
1. On oral motion made by the learned
Advocate appearing for the Petitioner, the
Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is
disposed of as such.
[R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR,J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Nirav Harshadrai Shah
The State of Maharashtra
R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court