“ In addition to that the applicant Union has also produced the letter written to the Commissioner of Labour by workmen by which charter of demands was submitted. In that letter it is clearly mentioned by the workmen that they are members of the applicant Union. In addition to that the applicant Union has examined two witnesses, who in their deposition stated about the resignation letters submitted by the employees from the membership of nonapplicant No.2 Union, as well as, affidavits produced on record by individual workmen. The applicant union has also filed the application for verification of common membership at Exh. U-12 which was objected by nonapplicant No.2 Union vide its say at Exh. UA-7 and my Ld. predecessor has disposed of the said application vide order as per Exh. O-7 dt. 26/08/2005. As against this, non-applicant No.2 Union has produced the membership list in Form “J” along with membership subscription receipts. However, there are no signatures of the members of non-applicant No.2 Union on the counter foils of the said membership subscription receipts. Nonapplicant No.2 Union has examined two witnesses. Thus, after assessing the evidence of both the parties, it is clear to me that the applicant Union in support of its claim, that its Union has largest membership during the period from May, 2003 to October, 2003, has relied on the resignation letters of the workmen resigned from the membership of non-applicant No.2 Union, the affidavits of the individual workmen and the membership subscription receipts from which it can be seen that there are signatures of individual workmen on the counter foils of subscription receipts towards the payment of the Union subscription fees. On the other hand, except the membership receipts and the
