Disposed
Mildred Mendonca and 6 Ors., v. State of Goa through Chief Secretary and 5 Ors.
Bombay HCWP/375/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 375…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 375 OF 2006
MILDRED MENDONCA AND 6 ORS., ....Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF ....Respondents SECRETARY AND 5 ORS.,
Advocate Ms. Norma Alvares, Amicus Curiae.
Mr. S. S. Kantak, Advocate General with Ms. R. Chodankar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the State/Respondent.
Mr. C. Mascarenhas, Advocate for the respondent No.7.
Coram:S.K. SHAH & N. A. BRITTO, JJ.
Date:15th January, 2007
P.C.
The respondent/State has filed an affidavit of one Micheal M. D'Souza, explaining the position.
The learned Amicus Curiae submits that the writ petition be disposed of as nothing more is required to be considered and requests for disposal of the writ petition. The writ petition is, accordingly, diposed of.
S.K. SHAH, J.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
ssm.
MILDRED MENDONCA AND 6 ORS.
STATE OF GOA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 5 ORS.
S.K. SHAH
N. A. BRITTO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court