This case is a brief order allowing an application for amendment in a writ petition against the State of Goa. The High Court disposed of the amendment application and listed the writ petition.
Application allowed; amendment to be carried out within two weeks; Writ Petition to come up after three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3 OF 2007
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 558 OF 2006
VASSUDEV N. KAMAT DALAL
....Applicant
Versus
STATE OF GOA THROUGH THE SECRETARY (REVENUE) & ANR.
....Respondents
Mr. R. Menezes, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. S.r. Rivonkar, Ga For R. 1 & 2
Coram:S.K. SHAH & N. A. BRITTO, JJ.
Date:15th January, 2007
P.C.:
This is an application for amendment. The learned counsel for the respondents does not object.
Application is allowed. Necessary amendment shall be carried out within a period of two weeks.
Application stands disposed of. Writ Petition to come up after three weeks.
S.K. SHAH, J.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
sl.
VASSUDEV N. KAMAT DALAL
STATE OF GOA THROUGH THE SECRETARY (REVENUE) & ANR.
S.K. SHAH
N. A. BRITTO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
