A writ petition was disposed of in accordance with the Minutes of the Order. The State had no objection. The judgment contains no substantive reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 334 OF 2002
SMT.KUNDDA RAGHUVIR ....Petitioner GHARSE,MARGAO,GOA.
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
....Respondent
Mr.M.S.Sonak, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.E.P.Badrinarayan,Addl.Central Government Standing Counsel for the Respondent No.1.
Mr. M. B. Da Costa, Senior Advocate with Mr. J. A. Lobo, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.3 to 5. Government Advocate for Respondent No.2.
Coram:S.K. SHAH &
N. A. BRITTO, JJ.
Date:9th January, 2007
P.C.:-
The Petitioner has placed before us the Minutes of the Order which is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The learned Counsel for the Respondent/State has no objection for disposal of the Writ Petition in accordance with the Minutes of the Order. The Writ Petition stands disposed of in terms of the Minutes of the Order.
S.K. SHAH, J.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
RD.
SMT.KUNDDA RAGHUVIR
UNION OF INDIA
S.K. SHAH
N. A. BRITTO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
