Appeal against a writ petition where the petitioner sought permission to withdraw with liberty. The court granted permission and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted with liberty to file afresh if a contingency arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION No.344/2007
(Goma Isan Nagarikar & anr. Vs. State of Mah. And ors.)
Appeal District : Application No. of 200 Writ petition
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr. R.S. Naktode, Adv. for the petitioners. Mr. A.D. Sonak, A.G.P. for respondents.
CORAM :D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 6, 2007.
Mr. Naktode, the learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file petition afresh, if the contingency arises. Permission granted.
Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE
JUDGE
RMP
Goma Isan Nagarikar
State of Mah.
D.D. Sinha
Vasanti A. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
