This judgment dismisses the writ petition for lack of prosecution. The court found no meaningful application of the petition and dismissed the matter without substantive engagement with legal merits or other provisions beyond the procedural note.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION No. 2990/1996
(Bhaurao Shivram Khandare Vs. State & 7 ors.)
Appeal Application No. Writ petition
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
District : of 200
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM :D.D. SINHA & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ. DATED :DECEMBER 5, 2007.
None for the petitioner.
Petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
JUDGE
JUDGE
RMP
Bhaurao Shivram Khandare
State
D.D. SINHA
VASANTI A. NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
