In this writ petition, the petitioner sought permission for repairs. The Corporation counsel undertook to pass an order within four weeks. Consequently, the petition, being subjudice, was disposed of without adjudication on merits.
Remands matter to corporation to pass order within four weeks; no benefit granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Writ Petition No 2031 of 2007
Shamsheed Ahmed Ansari
vs B.M. C and ors
......Petitioner
......Respondents
Mr O.P. Pandey i/b M/s Pandey & Co for Petitioner. Ms A.R. Joshi for BMC.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR,C.J.,& DR D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.
DATE: 17th October, 2007.
P.C.:-
The learned counsel for the Corporation states that they would consider the application of the petitioner seeking permission for repair etc and pass appropriate order within four weeks from today. In view of this statement nothing survives in this petition and the same is disposed of. Respondents to abide by their statement and pass appropriate order as also communicate the same to the petitioner. This order will not grant to the petitioner any benefit except that the respondents are expected to deal with the matter in accordance with law. No order as to costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR D.Y
CHANDRACHUD,J.
Shamsheed Ahmed Ansari
B.M.C and ors
Swatanter Kumar
Dr D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
