Petition under writ jurisdiction was withdrawn by the applicant's counsel on instructions. The High Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition with no order as to costs.
Leave granted to withdraw petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.198 OF 2004
--------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders
of Coram, appearances, Court’s .
orders or directions and .
Registrar’s orders .
Mr.Vinod Joshi i/b T.C. Kaushik &
Co.for the Petitioner.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
R.M. SAVANT, JJ.
DATED : 3RD APRIL, 2007.
P.C.:
1.Mentioned, not on board.
2.On instructions, the learned
counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave
to withdraw the Petition. The Petition
is dismissed as withdrawn with no order
as to costs. Rule is discharged.
(R.M. SAVANT, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Petitioner
Respondent
F.I. REBELLO
R.M. SAVANT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court