The High Court of Bombay died in the current writ petition seeking leave to withdraw it with liberty to approach the future petition. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue the fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1168 OF 2007
Hitendra R. Mahale....Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....Respondents
Mr.R.K. Mendadkar for the Petitioner.
Mr.A.A. Kumbhakoni, Associate Advocate General
with Mr.R.D. Rane, G.P. for the Respondents.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
R.M. SAVANT, JJ.
DATED : 3RD APRIL, 2007.
P.C. :
1.On account of subsequent events and as the
Petitioner has filed a fresh Petition, the learned
counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the
present Petition with liberty to pursue the Petition
now filed. The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
with liberty as prayed for. It is clear that all the
issues raised in the present Petition can be raised in
the other Petition.
(R.M. SAVANT, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Hitendra R. Mahale
The State of Maharashtra
F.I. REBELLO
R.M. SAVANT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court