Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. Court granted leave to withdraw and disposed of the petition without expressing an opinion on the issues raised.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1616 OF 2007
Mrs.Gayatree Jayant Amritkar..Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India
& Ors. ..Respondents
Mr.Abhay Nevagi with Yogesh Paranjape
i/b M/s.Paras Kuhad & Associates for
Petitioner
Mr.M.S.Mhambre APP for Respondent No.2
CORAM: R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 05, 2007
P.C.:
1. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner states
that in order to enable the Petitioner to approach
to the competent authority for appropriate reliefs,
the Petitioner craves leave to withdraw the
petition. Petition is accordingly allowed to be
withdrawn and stands disposed of.
2. We make it clear that we have not expressed any
opinion on any of the issues sought to be raised in
this petition.
[R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J.]
- 2 -
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Mrs. Gayatree Jayant Amritkar
Union of India
R.M.S.Khandeeparkar
V.K.Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court