Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the criminal writ petition due to the transfer of the investigating officer. The court allowed the withdrawal.
Leave to withdraw the criminal writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1328 OF 2007
Mr. Abdul Hafeez Habib Jagrala ] .. Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ] .. Respondents
Mr. Prakash Naik for the petitioner.
Mrs. A.S. Pail, APP, for the respondents No.1 and 2.
CORAM: S.B. MHASE &
SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATED: 10TH DECEMBER, 2007
P.C. :
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner states
that the investigation has already been transferred to
another officer, so also the earlier Investigating
Officer has been transferred. Therefore, the petitioner
seeks leave to withdraw the Petition. Petition is
allowed to be withdrawn.
[SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.]
Abdul Hafeez Habib Jagrala
The State of Maharashtra
S.B. MHASE
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court