Criminal Application under Criminal Appeal crafted by the Appellate Court dismissing the appeal as the High Court found the lower court's view to be a possible one, resulting in rejection of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3207 OF 2007
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2007
The State of Maharashtra ] .. Applicant/
Complainant
Versus
1. Ramesh Namdeo Gavade & 3 ors. ] .. Respondents
(Ori.Accused 1-4)
Mr. A.R. Patil, Addl.P.P. for the applicant.
Mr. S.T. Jadhav & Shri H.V. More for the respondents
No.1 to 4.
CORAM: S.B. MHASE &
SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATED: 10TH DECEMBER, 2007
P.C. :
1. Heard.
2. The view taken by the Ad-hoc District Judge-13
& Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, is a possible view.
The Criminal Application is rejected.
Sd/- Sd/-
[SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] [S.B. MHASE, J.]
The State of Maharashtra
Ramesh Namdeo Gavade & 3 ors.
S.B. MHASE
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court