Dismissed
Sadashiv Sharu Shrilimaye v. Union of India and 4 Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/21/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 21 OF 2007
Sadashiv Sharu Shrilimaye ... Petitioner
versus
Union of India and others ... Respondents
None for the petitioner. Ms. Kiran Bagalia for respondent No.5.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 2007 .
P.C.
Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner. None was present on the last date of hearing i.e. 16th August, 2007. Dismissed for
default of appearance.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Sadashiv Sharu Shrilimaye
Union of India
Swatanter Kumar
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court