PETITIONER'S representation considered by respondents resulting in no further action required in PIL No.106 of 2007.
Nothing survives in the petition; disposed accordingly with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.106 of 2007
Shri Sanjay B. Kotame .... Petitioner. V/s. The Regional Officer, Maharashtra Pollution Control Board & Ors. .... Respondent.
Mr.R.N.Gite for petitioner. Mr.V.P.Malvankar, Govt.Pleader for State.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
DATED : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2007.
P.C. :
Counsel appearing for the respondents state that the representation made by the petitioner will be taken into consideration and after considering the averments made therein, appropriate order will be passed after giving opportunity to the petitioner. In view of the statement made, nothing survives in the petition.
Petition is disposed of accordingly with no order as to
costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
J.P.DEVADHAR,
J.
Shri Sanjay B. Kotame
The Regional Officer, Maharashtra Pollution Control Board & Ors.
Swatanter Kumar
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
