The single-paragraph order records a respondent's submission for the matter to be looked into and states that the writ petition is disposed of without admitting receipt for or elaborating on the specific relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J.
WRIT PETITION NO.1786 OF 2007
Dharmendra Harilal Bhojak .. Petitioner v/s. M/s. S.S.J. Finance & security Pvt.Ltd. and others .. Respondents
Mr. K.K. Pandey for the Petitioner.
Mr. Haihangrang E.H. Newme i/by M/s. The Law Point for the respondent No.3.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
DATED : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2007
P.C.
The learned counsel for the respondent No.3 submits that respondent No.3 shall look into this matter and pass appropriate orders.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
Dharmendra Harilal Bhojak
M/s. S.S.J. Finance & security Pvt.Ltd.
others
Swatanter Kumar
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
