The High Court allowed the civil application permitting the applicants to withdraw funds upon furnishing security to protect the Union of India's interests.
Applicants allowed to withdraw the amount subject to furnishing of security to protect the interest of the Union of India.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2295 OF 2007 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.2433 OF 2006
Shri Dashrath Kana Patil & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra.
...Applicants.
...Respondent.
Mr. Sanjay Prabhu for the Applicants. Mr. K.K. Tated, AGP for the Respondent.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. August 21, 2007.
P.C. :
We have heard Counsel for the parties. Counsel appearing
for the State submits that if the Applicants-Respondents are permitted to withdraw the amount, it should be by furnishing security to protect the interest of ;Union of India. Consequently, the application is allowed. The applicants are at liberty to withdraw the amount subject
to the furnishing of the security to the satisfaction of the concerned
2
Court. The Civil Application is disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Dr.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Dashrath Kana Patil & Ors.
State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
