The High Court of Bombay dismissed the first appeal as withdrawn by the appellants. Consequently, the accompanying civil application was dismissed as extraneous without further issues arising.
The appeal dismissed as withdrawn; court fee refunded; civil application dismissed as extraneous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 2082 OF 2007
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3850 OF 2007
Many C. D’Mello
& Ors. .. Appellants.
vs.
Bank of Maharashtra. .. Respondent.
Mr. A.G. Damle for Appellants.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL &
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE: 25TH OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C.
. The learned counsel for the appellants states
that the appellants do not want to prosecute the appeal
and he wants to withdraw the same. Permitted to
withdraw. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No
order as to costs.
2. In view of the dismissal of the appeal as
withdrawn, permitted court fee be refunded to the
2
appellants as per rules.
3. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, the
civil application does not survive and the same is
dismissed as extraneous.
(J.N. Patel, J. )
(A.A. Sayed, J. )
Many C. D'Mello & Ors.
Bank of Maharashtra
J.N. Patel
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court