Allowed
Pannalal S. S. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCCAI/82/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 82 OF 2007
IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 1 OF 2007
Pannalal Shanti Swaroop. .. Applicant.
vs.
State of Maharashtra
& Ors. .. Respondents.
Mr. B.S. Patil h/f A.P. Gedam for Applicant.
Mr. V.P. Malvankar, AGP for respondent nos. 1 to 3 & 5.
Mr. G.S. Hegde for respondent no. 4.
Mr. A.G. Damle for respondent no. 7.
Ms. Sherwani Shailendra i/by Mr. P.S. Dani for
respondent no. 8.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL &
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE: 25TH OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C.
. Heard.
2. Allowed.
2
3. The necessary amendment to be carried out
within a week’s time. Amended copy of the petition be
placed on record and also be furnished to the
respondents. The respondents may file affidavits in
reply to the amendments sought by the petitioner. Put
up after Diwali Vacation, 2007.
(J.N. Patel, J. )
(A.A. Sayed, J. )
Pannalal Shanti Swaroop
State of Maharashtra
J.N. Patel
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court