Sesa Industries Limited v. Krishna H. Bajaj
Case brief
What is this about?
Brief adjournment order in a company application listing matter; no substantive decision provided in the text.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2007 IN
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 24 OF 2007
SESA INDUSTRIES LIMITED ... Applicant Versus KRISHNA H. BAJAJ ... Respondent
Mr. R. G. Ramani, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. V. A. Lawande, Advocate for the Respondent.
Coram:N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:10th August, 2007
P.C.:
Heard learned Counsel on behalf of both parties. Time fixed by order dated 13/07/2007 is extended by two weeks from today.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
NH
Parties & counsel
- applicant
SESA INDUSTRIES LIMITED
- respondent
KRISHNA H. BAJAJ
Coram
N. A. BRITTO
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Caroma Agencies Pvt. Ltd. Represented by Managing Director Carmelino Machado Vs Speedline Cargo Movers and Anr.
Caroma Agencies Pvt. Ltd. Represented by Managing Director Carmelino Machado Vs Speedline Cargo Movers and Anr.
Caroma Agencies Pvt. Ltd. Represented by Managing Director Carmelino Machado Vs Speedline Cargo Movers and Anr.
Shri. Vishnu Govind Naik Vs Harischandra D. Thakur and Anr.