Official Liquidator,High Court of Bombay, Panaji v. Paul Vaz and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA COMPANY APPLICATION…
What did the court decide?
approved expenditure towards publication
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 30 OF 2007
IN
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 41 OF 2001
OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR,HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY, PANAJI ... Applicant Versus PAUL VAZ & ANR. ... Respondent
Ms. Amira Razaq, Advocate for the Applicant.
Coram:N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:10th August, 2007
P.C.:
Heard Ms. Razaq.
The expenditure shown in the application towards publication is hereby approved.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
NH
OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR,HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY, PANAJI
PAUL VAZ & ANR.
N. A. BRITTO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court