Court permitted plaintiffs to amend the plaint in Suit No. 92 of 1982 as per the annexed schedule within two weeks. Chamber Summons granted and disposed of.
Permission to amend plaint as per annexed schedule; amendment to be made within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
MSS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVILJURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1034 OF 2007
IN
SUIT NO. 92 OF 1982
HARIKISHAN V. AGARWAL & ANR. .. PLAINTIFFS
Vs.
HOMI JAL CHIBBER & ORS. .. DEFENDANTS
Mr. D. R. Jhuriya for plaintiffs
Ms. Madhu Hiraskar i/b Chitnis Vaithy for D-4 to 10
Mr. Nitin Jain i/b Law Charter for D-8
CORAM:SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.
DATE: SEPTEMBER 07, 2007.
P.C.
. This Chamber Summons is taken out by the
plaintiffs for permission to amend the plaint as
per the Schedule annexed hereto.
. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in
support of the Chamber Summons, Chamber Summons is
made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a).
Amendment to be carried out within two weeks from
today. . Chamber Summons is disposed of.
2
JUDGE.
Harikishan Agarwal
Homi Jal Chibber
Ranjana Desai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court