On settlement between plaintiff and defendants, court recorded signed consent terms and disposed of Suit No. 1736 of 1994 with consequential order.
The plaintiff and defendants executed consent terms; suit disposed with order
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
MSS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVILJURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 1736 OF 1994
DEEPIKA SHASHANK MUNDLE .. PLAINTIFF
Vs.
MRS. E. NAZARETH & ANR. .. DEFENDANTS
Mr. Darshan Mehta i/b M/s. Dhruve Liladhar & Co.
for plaintiffs
Mr. Jayesh Vyas i/b Doijode Associates for
Defendant 2.
CORAM:SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.
DATED: SEPTEMBER 07, 2007.
P.C.
. The learned counsel for the parties state that
the plaintiff and defendants have amicably settled
the dispute. Consent Terms duly signed by the
plaintiff and 1st and 2nd defendants and their
respective advocates are taken on record and marked
"X".
2. Order in terms of the Consent Terms. Suit is
disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms.
JUDGE
Ranjana Desai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court