This order lists the parties in a second appeal and grants interim relief as prayed for, pending the disposal of the appeal.
Ad-interim relief granted as prayed for in terms of prayer clause (a)
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Lsp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 815 OF 2007 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.482 of 2007
Maruti N. Kore ...Appellant
V/s.
Ramchandra Hari Gadgil ...Respondent
Mr. A.V.Anturkar i/b. Sugandh Deshmukh for the Appellant
Mr.V.G.Mujumdar for the Respondent
CORAM:- Anoop V. Mohta, J
DATED:- 12th September, 2007.
P.C.
Considering the averments made and in view of
| . the |
substantial | ques |
tion |
of |
law as |
raised |
in | second | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| appeal, | a | sufficient | case | is | made |
out | by | the | applicant |
| for | interim | relief | as | prayed. | The | ad-interim, |
therefore, granted in terms of prayer clause (a)
pending the disposal of the second appeal.
(Anoop V. Mohta,J)
Maruti N. Kore
Ramchandra Hari Gadgil
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
