The High Court of Bombay considered a civil application challenging an order of interim maintenance. Finding no reason to modify the existing order, the court rejected the application and listed the appeal for a regular hearing.
Application rejected; appeal listed for further hearing. Interim maintenance order unmodified at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.225 OF 2007
IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.19 OF 2006
Mrs. Kavita Vijay Jindal..Applicant
V/s
Vijay Jugmundar Jindal..Respondent
Ms Neeta Karnik for the applicant
Mrs. Anita Agarwal for the respondent
CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 5TH OCTOBER, 2007
P.C.
A
.Heard. We do not find any reason to modify
the order of interim maintenance. Application is
rejected. Appeal be listed for hearing in regular
course.
( J.N.PATEL, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is any reason to modify the order of interim maintenance.
Mrs. Kavita Vijay Jindal
Vijay Jugmundar Jindal
J.N. Patel
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court