Appeal against pendency of contempt proceedings dismissed as infructuous since consent terms were filed and the matter was resolved at the single judge level.
Appeal disposed of as infructuous; no further proceedings required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
CONTEMPT APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2007 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.67 OF 2005 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.58 OF 2005 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO.59 OF 2005 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.436 OF 2004 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.83 OF 2000 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4176 OF 1998
Shri Narottam Janardhan Patil and another v/s.
Shri Dhananjay Janardhan Patil and others
.. Appellants
.. Respondents
Mr. K.N. Kore for the appellants. Mr. R.P. Lote for the respondent Nos.3,4,7,8 and 10.
CORAM : J.N. PATEL AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATED : 4TH OCTOBER, 2007
P.C.
The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that keeping the contempt petition pending without any subsisting cause of action is a punishment to the appellants and that is why the appellants have approached this court and preferred this appeal.
terms have been filed by the parties and the matter is now set at rest and therefore, nothing survives in the matter.
(J.N. PATEL, J.)
(A.A. SAYED, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal against keeping the contempt petition pending was tenable.
Whether the appeal survives after consent terms were filed and matter set at rest.
Shri Narottam Janardhan Patil
Shri Dhananjay Janardhan Patil
J.N. PATEL
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
