Disposed
Mahananda Mogalaji Gandapwad v. State of Maharashtra and Nar.
Bombay HCWP/8601/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.8601 OF 2005
Mahananda Mogalaji Gandapwad .... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents
Shri R.K. Mendadkar, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Shri C.R. Sonawane, AGP, for the State.
CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR &
NARESH H. PATIL, JJ.
DATED: AUGUST 16, 2006
P.C:
Since with the passage of time the petition is
rendered infructuous, the learned Advocate for the
petitioner craves leave to withdraw the petition with
liberty to take appropriate steps as may be available to
the petitioner. The petition is accordingly allowed to
be withdrawn and stands disposed of accordingly.
(Naresh H. Patil, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.)
sjs/816wp8601.05
Mahananda Mogalaji Gandapwad
State of Maharashtra
R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR
NARESH H. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court