Petitioner filed a writ petition which was subsequently withdrawn before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the matter with no order as to costs.
Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn; rule discharged with no order as to costs
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.1565 OF 1999
Shri Nagnath Yadav Dorle .... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents
Shri A.M. Joshi, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Ms M.P. Thakur, AGP, for the State.
CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR &
NARESH H. PATIL, JJ.
DATED: AUGUST 16, 2006
P.C:
The learned Advocate for the petitioner states
that on account of subsequent events in the matter, the
petitioner wants to withdraw the petition. The petition
is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn and stands
disposed of accordingly. Rule stands discharged with no
order as to costs.
(Naresh H. Patil, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.)
sjs/816wp1565.99
Shri Nagnath Yadav Dorle
State of Maharashtra
R.M.S. Khandeparkar
Nareth H. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court