Petitioner withdrew Cr. W.P. No. 735 of 2006. The single-judge Bench disposed of the petition and directed the lower Magistrate to decide the Section 457 Cr.P.C. application expeditiously given the film's scheduled release.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; Magistrate directed to decide Section 457 Cr.P.C. application expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.735 OF 2006
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Office notes, office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders.
of Coram, appearance, Court’s
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders.
Mr. Subhash Jha i/by Sushil K.
Chourasia for the Petitioner.
Mr.A.M. Sarogi for the Respondent No.2
and 3.
Mr.S.V.Marwadi for the Respondent Nos.
5 and 6.
Mr.M.M.Chopra for the Respondent No.7.
Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, APP. for the
State.
CORAM : R.S. MOHITE,J.
DATED : 13/4/2006.
P.C.
1. The Advocate for the petitioner
states that he would like to withdraw
this petition and apply before the
Magistrate for return of the material
which has already been seized. In the
circumstances, petition is disposed off
as withdrawn.
:2:
2. Since the film is scheduled for
release and distributors have invested
monies to secure the release of the
film, it is expected that the
Magistrate who is hearing the
application under Section 457 of the
Cr.P.C,. would hear and decide the
said application expeditiously.
(R. S. MOHITE, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Respondent Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7
State
R.S. Mohite
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court