The High Court at Bombay granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw a writ petition that had become infructuous, leading to the discharge of the applicable rule.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted and the rule is discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.[1].
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.413 OF 1999
Sarva Shramik Sangh ...Petitioner.
Versus
M/s.Graham Firth Steel
Products (India) Ltd.,
and 2 Ors. ...Respondents.
Mr.N.M.Ganguli, Advocate for the Petitioner.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATED : NOVEMBER 23, 2006.
P.C.:
. Heard the learned counsel for the
petitioner. The learned counsel for the
petitioner states that as of today the Petition
has become infructuous; and seeks leave to
withdraw the same. In view thereof, Rule stands
discharged.
[DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Sarva Shramik Sangh
M/s. Graham Firth Steel Products (India) Ltd.
DR. S. Radhakrishnan
Smt. V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court