Petitioner sought leave to withdraw his Petition No. 3037 of 1999 in the High Court at Bombay. The High Court granted the request, and the Rule stands discharged.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3037 OF 1999
Prakash S. Baviskar
..Petitioner
Vs.
Seva Ashram Sikshan Sanstha & Ors.
..Respondents
Ms.Sonali Humane i/b.Mr.Susheel Mahadeshwar for the Petitioner. Ms.S.M.Dandekar, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : 22ND NOVEMBER, 2006
P.C.
The learned Counsel for the Petitioner on instructions
seeks leave to withdraw the Petition. Hence, Rule
stands discharged.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
Prakash S. Baviskar
Seva Ashram Sikshan Sanstha
DR. RADHAKRISHNAN
V. K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
