Dismissed
Sanjay Sales Corpn. v. National Aluminium Co.LTDand Ors.
Bombay HCWP/2974/1990
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.[1].
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2974 OF 1990
M/s.Sanjay Sales Corporation
and Anr. ...Petitioners.
Versus
National Aluminium Co. Ltd.,
and Anr. ...Respondents.
....
Nafisa Hamid i/b. Khaitan & Jayakar, Advocate for
the Petitioners.
Mr.Ramesh Dadikh i/b. Federal & Rashmikant,
Advocate for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATED : NOVEMBER 23, 2006.
P.C.:
. Heard the learned counsel for the
petitioners and respondent No.1. The learned
counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to
withdraw the Petition, as the same has become
infructuous as of today. Hence, Rule stands
discharged.
[DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.]
[SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
M/s.Sanjay Sales Corporation and Anr.
National Aluminium Co. Ltd. and Anr.
DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court