The High Court of Bombay disposed of a writ petition noting that an appeal by respondent No.3 against a Tribunal order had been admitted by the Supreme Court, rendering the present petition not deserving of admission.
The writ petition was disposed of as not deserving admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.339 OF 2006
Sohanbhai Soni .. Petitioner.
V/s.
Union of India & Others .. Respondents.
Mr.Vikram Nankani with Mr.Madhur Baya for the
petitioner.
Mr.S.M. Shah with Mrs.N.V. Masurkar for the
respondents.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 16TH MARCH, 2006.
P.C. :
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned counsel for the respondents.
2. We are informed that appeal at the instance
of the present respondent No.3 against the order
dated 18th March, 2005 passed by the Customs, Excise
and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has been admitted
by the Supreme Court of India. In view thereof, we
are satisfied that the present writ petition does not
deserve to be admitted.
3. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed
of.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
2
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Sohanbhai Soni
Union of India
R.M. LODHA
J.P. DEVADHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court