The High Court allowed the petitioners to reship confiscated goods to the supplier as they deposited the redemption fine within the stipulated one-month period from the order date of 28.12.2005.
Petitioners allowed to reship confiscated goods; authorities directed to issue formal order for reshipment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J.
WRIT PETITION NO.485 OF 2006
M/s.Ratna Kala Exports and another v/s.
The Union of India and others
.. Petitioners
.. Respondents
Mr.Mohan V. Jaykar i/by M/s.Khaitan & Jaykar for the petitioners.
Ms.Neeta V.Masurkar for the respondents.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 14TH MARCH, 2006.
P.C.
Heard.
2
order and, therefore, the petitioners can now reship the confiscated goods to the supplier.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners can reship confiscated goods after depositing the redemption fine within the prescribed time.
M/s. Ratna Kala Exports and another
The Union of India and others
R.M. LODHA
J.P.DEVADHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
