Disposed
natwarlal harilal sanghavi v. jagdish kantilal shah
Bombay HCSS/3285/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 3285 OF 2005
Natwarlal Harilal Sanghavi ....... Plaintiff
Versus
Jagdish Kantilal Shah ....... Defendant
Mr. Mangesh Chavan for the Plaintiff.
Mr. R.M. Vanoo for the Defendant.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.
DATE : 22ND NOVEMBER 2006
P.C.
1) The suit is disposed of in terms of consent
terms signed by the parties and their Advocates, taken
on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. The
parties are present in the Court.
2) Refund as per rules.
3) For the purpose of refund, Prothonotary and
Senior Master is requested to act on the copy of this
order authenticated by the Registry.
S.J. VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court