Suit disposed of by consent. Decree granted in terms of consent terms filed by plaintiff and defendant Nos. 1 and 2. Suit against remaining defendants not pressed. Refund ordered.
Decree in terms of consent terms; suit against remaining defendants not pressed; refund ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 420 OF 2004
Kuldeep K. Nayar ....... Plaintiff
Versus
Ravinder K. Nayar & Ors. ....... Defendants
Mr. S.P.Kanuga for the Plaintiff
Mr. Vatsal Shah i/b Pandya & Poonawala for Defendant
No. 1.
Ms. Sapna Nath i/b H.P. Vyas & Bhaktwani for
defendant no. 2.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.
DATE : 22ND NOVEMBER 2006
P.C.
1) By consent, suit is placed on board. The suit
is disposed of in terms of the consent terms filed
between the plaintiff and defendant Nos. 1 and 2.
Decree in terms of said consent terms, which are taken
on record and marked "X". The Undertakings contained
in the consent terms are accepted.
2
2) The suit as against remaining defendants is not
pressed.
3) Refund as per rules.
4) For the purpose of refund, Prothonotary and
Senior Master is requested to act on the copy of this
order duly authenticated by Registry.
Kuldeep K. Nayar
Ravinder K. Nayar
S.J. VAZIFDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court