Petitioner sought withdrawal of Public Interest Litigation. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. Adjourned hearing on related municipal proceedings.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.65 OF 2005
Jagadish B. Pandey
......Petitioner.
V/s
The State of Maharashtra Through Urban Development Department ....... Mantralaya, Mumbai & Ors. Respondents.
Mr. Ambar Joshi for the Petitioner.
Ms. P.S. Cardoz, AGP for Respondent No.1.
Mr. R.S. Apte for Respondent No.2.
Mr. K.K. Malpathak for Respondent Nos. 5 & 6. ----
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & V.M.KANADE, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 10, 2007
P.C.
learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, seeks to withdraw the Petition.
2
Respondent No.2 - Municipal Corporation.
3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jagadish B. Pandey
The State of Maharashtra Through Urban Development Department
H.L. Gokhale
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
