In a notice of motion under W.P. No. 453 of 1997, the Bombay High Court disposed of the matter by ordering that no order on the merits was required at that stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[-1-]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.86 OF 2006
IN
W.P.NO.453 OF 1997
Vasantkumar Shankar Kulkarni
and two Ors. ..Petitioners
Vs.
The Board of Trustees of
the Port of Bombay & Anr. ..Respondents
...
Mr.T.R.Yadav i/b K.S.Bapat Advocate
for Petitioners
Mr.S.Ramaswamy i/b Mulla & Mulla & Craigie
Blunt & Caroe for Respondents
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : JULY 7, 2006
P.C.
1. For the present no order is required. Motion is
disposed of.
[ F.I.REBELLO, J.]
[ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Vasantkumar Shankar Kulkarni
Two Os.
The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay
Anr.
F.I. Rebello
Smt. V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court