Judgment allows a writ petition based on considerations of a prior order, making it absolute as per a specific prayer clause and directing respondents to dispose of an application within twelve weeks.
Petition made absolute in terms of Prayer Clause (b) and respondents directed to dispose of the Application within twelve weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 777 OF 2006
Shri. Lekhraj Jessumal Jethani ... Petitioner
Vs.
Shri. D.R. Mali, Chief Settlement
Commissioner and Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. P.K. Dhakephalkar with Mr. J.S. Chandnani for
Petitoenr.
Ms. Geeta Shastri, A.G.P. for R. Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&
MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : 06TH JULY, 2006
P.C.:
. Rule. Heard forthwith.
. Considering the order dated 21.11.2005, in writ
Petition No. 442 of 2005, this petition will have
to be allowed. In the light of that, petition made
absolute in terms of Prayer Clause (b). The
Respondents are directed to dispose of the
Application within twelve weeks from today.
(MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)(F.I.REBELLO,J.)
Shri. Lekhraj Jessumal Jethani
Shri. D.R. Mali
F.I. Rebello
M.R. V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court