One judge disposition dismissing a motion for interim relief by holding that the grievance can be considered only during the final decision of the parent petition.
Interim relief not granted on the basis of affidavit; grievance to be considered on final decision of petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[-1-]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.77 OF 2006
IN
W.P.NO.112 OF 1998
Deepak Vishwanath Dhuri
and Ors. ..Petitioners
Vs.
State of Mah. and Anr. ..Respondents
And
Rehman Sheikh Rashid ..Applicant
...
Mr.Bhavesh Parmar Advocate for Petitioner-
Applicant
Mr.G.W.Matto AGP for Respondent No.1
Mrs.A.K.Savla Advocate for Respondent No.2
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATE : JULY 7, 2006
P.C.
1. This Motion is taken out by Petitioner No.7.
Considering the affidavit filed by Bansi Bhaguji
Gawali, it will not be possible for us to grant
reliefs as prayed for. Petitioner’s grievance can be
considered when the petition itself will be decided
finally.
2. With the above observation, Motion is disposed
of.
[ F.I.REBELLO, J.]
[ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Deepak Vishwanath Dhuri and Ors.
State of Mah.
F.I. Rebello
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court