Dismissed
Raymond Ltd. v. M/S. Filex
Bombay HCNMS/1014/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Defendant undertook to cease using labels identical or deceptively similar to Plaintiff's. Court held the suit was infructuous and dismissed the notice of motion accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Defendant to undertake not to deal in impugned label or any identical/deceptively similar label; suit and notice of motion dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶2
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1014 OF 2005
IN
SUIT NO. 992 OF 2005
¶3
Raymond Ltd.
¶4
] .. Plaintiff
¶5
Versus
¶6
M/s. Filex.] .. Defendant
¶7
Mr. Salil M. Shah with Amit Vyas i/b Rajani Associates
for the plaintiffs.
¶8
Mr. Kunal Damle i/b Udwadia Udeshi for the defendant.
¶9
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
¶10
DATED: 16TH MARCH, 2006
¶11
P.C. :
¶12
.Parties have no objection for the hearing of
this matter by this Bench.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the suit for copyright infringement and passing off is liable to be dismissed as infructuous upon the defendant's undertaking.
Coram
AI extract
Anoop V. Mohta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court