In this writ petition, the Bombay High Court disposed of the matter upon settlement reached between the parties via a mediator and a subsequent consent deed, permitting the respondent to withdraw the disputed amount.
Petition disposed with liberty; respondent permitted to withdraw the said amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[-1-]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 69 OF 2003
New Great Eastern
and Weaving Co. Ltd. . Petitioner
Vs.
Vithabai J. Keer
and anr. Respondents.
Mrs. S. C. Naidu with B.H. Gada i/b C.R.
Naidu & Co. for petitioner.
Ms. Gayatri Singh for respondent No.1.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.
DATE : MARCH 10, 2006.
PC :
. In pursuance to the order dated 8th July, 2000,
the matter was referred to the mediator. The
matter has been accordingly settled in terms of
settlement dt. 30th January, 2005, and it has
been duly signed by the parties and the mediator.
2. Pursuant to the same, consent deed dated 10th
March, 2006 has been filed, marked as "X", as
matter is settled, as referred above. The
petition is disposed of accordingly, with liberty.
[-2-]
3. The first respondent is permitted to withdraw
the said amount.
4. Parties to act on the basis of authenticated copies.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
New Great Eastern and Weaving Co. Ltd.
Vithabai J. Keer
Anoop V. Mocha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court