The single judge disposed of a first appeal where parties submitted consent terms. The court recorded the consent terms and granted liberty to the appellant to withdraw the mentioned amount in compliance with clause 5 of the consent.
Liberty granted to withdraw the amount mentioned in clause 5 of the Consent Terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO.236 of 2005
1. New India Assurance co. Ltd. and Anr..Appellants
V/s
Jeevan Babu Chavan and Ors. .. Respondents
Shri S.M.Vidyarthi for appellants
Suresh S. Rakab for Respondent no.4
Manoj S. Javheri for Respodnent nos.1 to 3
CORAM:S.R.SATHE,J.
DATED:18th Jan. 2006
P.C.:-
. Heard both the learned Advocates.
. They submit that parties are settled the matter in
terms of Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on
record and marked ’X’ for identification.
. Liberty is granted to withdraw the amount as
mentioned in clause 5 of the Consent Terms.
. The Respondent o n.3 has filed affidavit. The same
is taken on record.
. Order in terms of Consent Terms.
(S.R.SATHE,J.)
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Anr.
Jeevan Babu Chavan and Ors.
S.R.Sathe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court