The Court disposed of a Civil Application arising from a Writ Petition concerning the reversion of direct recruits. The bench held that as the order of reversion had already been effectively implemented, nothing further survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.226 OF 2005
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.8404 OF 2004
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda
of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders
orders or directions and
Registrar’s orders
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Ms.Manjiri Parsais i/b Mr.G.S.Godbole for
the Petitioners.
Mr.P.M.Pradhan with Mr.S.S.Pakale and
Ms.Leena Patil for Respondent No.1.
Mr.Y.R.Mishra for Respondent NOs.3 and 6.
Mr.S.V.Marne for the Intervenors/direct
recruits.
...
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO, J. and
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
17th February, 2006.
P.C.:
Counsel appearing for the direct
recruits points out that the order of
reversion dated 20th January, 2005 has
already been given effect to. Once that be
the case, nothing further survives in the
Civil Application. The Civil Application
is accordingly disposed of.
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.)
Petitioners
Respondent No.1
Respondent Nos.3 and 6
Intervenors/direct recruits
F.I. REBELLO
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court